Bye-Bye Supersized Drinks?


By Dr. Madelyn Fernstrom

Across the nation nearly everyone I speak with has a strong reaction to last week’s plan led by New York City’s mayor to ban sugary drinks larger than 16 ounces (a typical “medium”). This includes both bottled and fountain drinks containing more than 25 calories in an eight-ounce serving. The ban would not affect 100% juices or drinks containing 50% or more of milk or a milk substitute (like milkshakes).

Anyone wanting to purchase a 32-ounce drink can purchase two 16-ounce drinks. And that’s the source of the problem. Should the government intervene in a private area like food choice? Freedom of choice, with value is the question here. People have joked about what’s next: smaller slices of pizza, a thinner burger, smaller cookies?

While it seems unlikely that this policy will become a law, from both the regulatory and legal points of view, this attention-grabbing concept is causing a lot of controversy.

Going “retro” on drink sizes makes a lot of sense, and it’s not a new concept. Twenty years ago, 16 ounces seemed like a big size, considering that seven- to eight-ounce servings were very common. And, in Europe, these mega-size cups are not even available. In my mind, size is all relative to what you’re accustomed to!

Is it unfair for people to pay more for a larger size drink? Do these supersized drinks contribute to obesity? Depending on the circumstances, the answer can be “yes” or “no.”

What do you think of this policy? And how do you think this policy would be received in the greater Pittsburgh region? I’d really love to hear your thoughts in this controversial area!

Here's an infographic from the CDC for some perspective on the change in portions over the years:



Komentar

Postingan populer dari blog ini

The Truth About Sea Salt

The Verdict on Sugar

Is Obesity the New Normal?